logo
. . .

Your Own VPS, Fully Managed by Experts

Experience fast VPS servers with a 99% up time guarantee. Enjoy affordable digital resources that match your business size and budget.

Get Started Now
vps image

Choose Your VPS Hosting Plan

Choose from a variety of configurations to suit your target use.

VCPU Memory CPU Power Storage Price
1 vCPU 1GB 2.4GHz1 core 20GB

R113 /month

Order Now
1 vCPU 2GB 2.4GHz1 core 50GB

R189 /month

Order Now
2 vCPU 2GB 4.8GHz2 cores 80GB

R269 /month

Order Now
2 vCPU 4GB 4.8GHz2 cores 100GB

R379 /month

Order Now
4 vCPU 8GB 9.6GHz4 cores 200GB

R759 /month

Order Now
6 vCPU 12GB 14.4GHz6 cores 300GB

R1200 /month

Order Now
8 vCPU 16GB 19.2GHz8 cores 400GB

R1500 /month

Order Now
12 vCPU 32GB 28.8GHz12 cores 500GB

R2400 /month

Order Now
16 vCPU 64GB 38.4GHz12 cores 500GB

R4100 /month

Order Now

Frequently Asked Questions

Go through some of the most frequently asked questions and their answers. Feel free to reach out to us with any inquiry and we will get back to you as soon as we can. Can't find the answer you're looking for? Contact us.

Virtual Private Servers (VPS) offer a range of benefits, including flexibility, control, and cost-efficiency. However, they also come with several limitations that users should consider:

Resource Limitations

  • Unlike dedicated servers, VPS resources (CPU, RAM, disk space) are limited and fixed. If the demand exceeds the allocated resources, performance can degrade.
  • The virtualization layer consumes some resources, reducing the amount available to each VPS.
  • Performance Variability

  • Despite being isolated, VPS instances share physical resources with other VPS instances on the same host. High resource usage by one or more neighbors can impact performance.
  • Performance can be affected by other VPSs on the same server if they consume excessive resources.
  • Scalability Constraints

  • Scaling up resources (e.g., increasing CPU or RAM) is limited by the physical server’s capacity. Beyond a certain point, upgrading may require migrating to a new server or provider.
  • Scaling up often requires a reboot or migration, leading to potential downtime.
  • Security Risks

  • While VPS provides better isolation than shared hosting, vulnerabilities in the hypervisor or misconfigurations can potentially be exploited to gain access to other VPS instances on the same host.
  • Security breaches on the physical host can affect all VPS instances.
  • Security Risks

  • While VPS provides better isolation than shared hosting, vulnerabilities in the hypervisor or misconfigurations can potentially be exploited to gain access to other VPS instances on the same host.
  • Security breaches on the physical host can affect all VPS instances.
  • Management Complexity

  • Managing a VPS requires more technical expertise compared to shared hosting. Users need to handle server setup, maintenance, security, and troubleshooting.
  • Many VPS plans are self-managed, requiring users to be responsible for software updates, security patches, and backups.
  • Cost Considerations

  • VPS hosting is more expensive than shared hosting due to dedicated resources and increased management requirements.
  • Additional software or operating system licenses may be required, adding to the overall cost.
  • Potential Downtime

  • Physical server failures can result in downtime for all VPS instances on that server. While VPS providers often have redundancy measures, there is still a risk.
  • Periodic maintenance on the physical server can lead to temporary downtime for VPS instances.
  • Backup and Recovery

  • In many cases, users are responsible for their own backups. Failure to implement regular backups can lead to data loss in case of a failure or corruption.
  • While VPS hosting offers a good balance between cost and control, it is essential to weigh these limitations against your specific needs and technical capabilities. For businesses or applications requiring high performance, scalability, and robust security, dedicated servers or cloud hosting might be more appropriate despite the higher cost.

    Loading...

    Loading...

    Loading...